top of page

Blue Ticks are gone: The real reason why they're so angry


Opening up Twitter today, there’s a lot of anger. Following the change of yesterday, blue ticks as they were may be gone but true colours are being shown right now.


Journalists, celebrities, influencers, and anyone who had the former privilege of a verified account are all shouting out in anger. Their usual breezy personas and carefully crafted online identities all thrown into disarray. Because losing that tick is more than just verification, it’s status, it’s culture and it’s the well-defined line between us and them.


Load up Twitter today and ranting tweets are filling up timelines with various digitally mediated attacks, mocking those who have ‘actually paid’ for a Twitter Blue subscription. There are two reasons for this, one being the official line and the other being something deeper. It's personal, it's neoliberal and it hurts the hierarchy. They had their status and now it has been taken away.



The official line amidst all of this anger is that these former blue tick people are angry because they can no longer be verified, they’re worried about misinformation or being impersonated. It is perhaps these people who are the greatest critics of Twitter Blue. They don’t believe that paying for a subscription is a ‘real’ blue tick. People who do so are stereotyped as ‘stupid’ or lesser in some way. After all, by bringing everyday people into the world of blue ticks, there is no longer an aesthetic division between us.


So invalidating those who pay for a blue tick is a logical tactic. It dehumanises these people, makes them appear as a bit ‘simple’ or egotistical in some way. Blur the lines between different social classes and this is what happens. Everyone had their place before, it was stable and understood. So when those positions become threatened, it's going to hit hard. Especially for those who believe that they are of greater worth than someone with a handle of followers. It's that fickle.


We cannot underestimate what the blue tick symbolised before Twitter Blue subscriptions came into play. For years, the blue tick has been widely understood and normalised as the distinction between those at the heights of success and the average Joes. More so than likes, or follower counts, the blue tick is or at least was the absolute peak of Twitter success. It’s the ultimate symbol of worth in a neoliberal attention economy that saturates almost every aspect of our online lives.


Hierarchies are the absolute centre of what Twitter was and remains to be today. The only difference with this change is that those who were given a high-status position just for being who they are now need to pay. Just like the rest of us. It’s not about affordability for those who have money, it’s the principle of being treated like everyone else. People who they perceive as beneath them in the class hierarchy. People who have less, people without status. On the other hand, and this is a valid argument, there is anger from everyday folk too. Those who use Twitter but maybe cannot afford to pay for Twitter Blue which is more relatable. After all, for many of us it’s costly and not just financially.


I’ll be completely honest, we do have a Twitter Blue subscription for Aunty Social World's Twitter. Because right now she’s young and as we’ve seen of late, we’re in a state of algorithmic anarchy. Building a following or movement doesn’t come easy in the world of Twitter today.


Yet where we are now in an era of attacks coming in from both the privileged elite, enraged at the peasantry being offered the same as them, or our allies blocking and mocking us - I think the argument missing from all of this is that for some of us, we need Twitter to survive:



If budgeting for a blue tick helps in the world Twitter has become today, then so be it. Because not all of us have countless options open to us, we are mired in a status-driven attention economy that doesn’t care who is disabled or who is in need. Attention isn’t always about ego, it's quite often survival.


Whether you are a proponent of this change, or angered by it, what we can agree on is that Twitter is changing and for now, none of us truly understand where it is going. But coming together and resisting the urge to attack others, will help collectivism in the future. Because attention economies are already highly individualised and divisive, blue tick or not that hasn’t changed. But we can stand against this by coming together.

 

What do you think? We would love to hear your thoughts. Comment below or come and connect with us on Twitter.


5 Comments


Liz
Liz
Apr 21, 2023

I can understand the anger, so not surprising. I looked at those blue ticks that celebrities had knowing they were genuine accounts. I had many who tried to follow me that imitated those accounts and so I blocked and removed them. But I nearly did get caught out twice by those.

Now, those blue ticks will mean nothing to me. I won't know who was a genuine or mimickingthem now, if I was still on Twitter. But thankfully, I am not there anymore.

Like
Liz
Liz
Apr 21, 2023
Replying to

It certainly isn't the same. It could have been handled better.

Like

Guest
Apr 21, 2023

So typical from the elites. Level the playing field and they're up in arms because it puts us all on an equal footing of pay or don't pay. They believe us mere mortals shouldn't have a choice

Like
Jon
Jon
Apr 21, 2023
Replying to

Completely agree with this. Thank you!

Like
bottom of page